Compare
Credit Card Receivables Fund vs Eaton Group Attorneys
On the complaint record, Credit Card Receivables Fund scores higher (44/100 against 35): it answered 96.4% on time and gave relief in 0% of closed complaints, against 96.4% and 0% for Eaton Group Attorneys.
| Credit Card Receivables Fund | Eaton Group Attorneys | |
|---|---|---|
| Response Score | 44/100 | 35/100 |
| Complaints, last 12 months | 28 | 28 |
| Change on the year before | -48% | +40% |
| Answered on time | 96.4% | 96.4% |
| Closed with relief | 0% | 0% |
| Closed with money back | 0% | 0% |
| Complaints, all time | 547 | 119 |
| Top problem | Took or threatened to take negative or legal action | Attempts to collect debt not owed |
| Visitors' rating | - | - |
Highlighted: the better figure. Bigger companies get more complaints, so compare the shares and the trend rather than the totals.
Credit Card Receivables Fund by month
Eaton Group Attorneys by month
Complaint records are public consumer complaints filed with U.S. regulators, checked (newest received Nov 15, 2026). Complaints are consumers' own accounts and are not verified; counts grow with a company's size. How the data works
Which would you choose?
No comments yet. Start the conversation - questions are welcome too.