Compare
Bilt Technologies vs Mercury Financial Intermediate
On the complaint record, Mercury Financial Intermediate scores higher (54/100 against 8): it answered 99.5% on time and gave relief in 7% of closed complaints, against 81.1% and 10% for Bilt Technologies.
| Bilt Technologies | Mercury Financial Intermediate | |
|---|---|---|
| Response Score | 8/100 | 54/100 |
| Complaints, last 12 months | 681 | 206 |
| Change on the year before | +1,210% | +42% |
| Answered on time | 81.1% | 99.5% |
| Closed with relief | 10% | 7% |
| Closed with money back | 8% | 6.5% |
| Complaints, all time | 745 | 458 |
| Top problem | Problem with a purchase shown on your statement | Fees or interest |
| Visitors' rating | - | - |
Highlighted: the better figure. Bigger companies get more complaints, so compare the shares and the trend rather than the totals.
Bilt Technologies by month
Mercury Financial Intermediate by month
Complaint records are public consumer complaints filed with U.S. regulators, checked (newest received Nov 15, 2026). Complaints are consumers' own accounts and are not verified; counts grow with a company's size. How the data works
Which would you choose?
No comments yet. Start the conversation - questions are welcome too.