Share your experienceShare
Companies A-Z Rankings Categories Problems By state Latest complaints Trends Compare Experiences Reports Guides Share your experience
Theme

Compare

F.H. Cann & Associates vs McCarthy, Burgess & Wolff

On the complaint record, McCarthy, Burgess & Wolff scores higher (74/100 against 55): it answered 100% on time and gave relief in 25% of closed complaints, against 100% and 0% for F.H. Cann & Associates.

F.H. Cann & Associates
McCarthy, Burgess & Wolff
F.H. Cann & AssociatesMcCarthy, Burgess & Wolff
Response Score55/10074/100
Complaints, last 12 months135130
Change on the year before-1%+18%
Answered on time100%100%
Closed with relief0%25%
Closed with money back0%0%
Complaints, all time519908
Top problemAttempts to collect debt not owedAttempts to collect debt not owed
Visitors' rating--

Highlighted: the better figure. Bigger companies get more complaints, so compare the shares and the trend rather than the totals.

F.H. Cann & Associates by month

McCarthy, Burgess & Wolff by month

Which would you choose?

Be kind and stick to facts. No account numbers or other people's details. Rules

No comments yet. Start the conversation - questions are welcome too.

Compare two others

Complaint records are public consumer complaints filed with U.S. regulators, checked (newest received Nov 15, 2026). Complaints are consumers' own accounts and are not verified; counts grow with a company's size. How the data works

Check the record before you sign.

Then add to it. Every experience you share - good or bad - goes on that company's record and helps the next person decide. Two minutes, anonymous.

Share your experience