Compare
Security Finance vs The Receivable Management Services
On the complaint record, The Receivable Management Services scores higher (52/100 against 51): it answered 100% on time and gave relief in 0% of closed complaints, against 100% and 0% for Security Finance.
| Security Finance | The Receivable Management Services | |
|---|---|---|
| Response Score | 51/100 | 52/100 |
| Complaints, last 12 months | 552 | 585 |
| Change on the year before | +37% | +32% |
| Answered on time | 100% | 100% |
| Closed with relief | 0% | 0% |
| Closed with money back | 0% | 0.2% |
| Complaints, all time | 2,164 | 2,051 |
| Top problem | Took or threatened to take negative or legal action | Attempts to collect debt not owed |
| Visitors' rating | - | - |
Highlighted: the better figure. Bigger companies get more complaints, so compare the shares and the trend rather than the totals.
Security Finance by month
The Receivable Management Services by month
Complaint records are public consumer complaints filed with U.S. regulators, checked (newest received Nov 15, 2026). Complaints are consumers' own accounts and are not verified; counts grow with a company's size. How the data works
Which would you choose?
No comments yet. Start the conversation - questions are welcome too.