Compare
Capital Management Services vs McCarthy, Burgess & Wolff
On the complaint record, McCarthy, Burgess & Wolff scores higher (74/100 against 54): it answered 100% on time and gave relief in 25% of closed complaints, against 100% and 0% for Capital Management Services.
| Capital Management Services | McCarthy, Burgess & Wolff | |
|---|---|---|
| Response Score | 54/100 | 74/100 |
| Complaints, last 12 months | 125 | 130 |
| Change on the year before | +13% | +18% |
| Answered on time | 100% | 100% |
| Closed with relief | 0% | 25% |
| Closed with money back | 0% | 0% |
| Complaints, all time | 784 | 908 |
| Top problem | Attempts to collect debt not owed | Attempts to collect debt not owed |
| Visitors' rating | - | - |
Highlighted: the better figure. Bigger companies get more complaints, so compare the shares and the trend rather than the totals.
Capital Management Services by month
McCarthy, Burgess & Wolff by month
Complaint records are public consumer complaints filed with U.S. regulators, checked (newest received Nov 15, 2026). Complaints are consumers' own accounts and are not verified; counts grow with a company's size. How the data works
Which would you choose?
No comments yet. Start the conversation - questions are welcome too.